Good to Know

Sand Filter vs. Alfawater: Which Water Filtration Technology Can Truly Cut Industrial Costs?

1.0 Introduction: Why Water Filtration Matters in Industrial Operations

Water is one of the most essential elements in virtually every industrial process — from automotive manufacturing to food production. Maintaining a consistent level of clean, high-quality water is therefore the cornerstone of any factory’s operational efficiency.

This article aims to compare two fundamentally different water filtration technologies: the long-established Traditional Sand Filter System, and the modern, highly efficient Alfawater Automatic Self-Cleaning Screen Filter.

To fully appreciate the advantages of modern filtration technology, let’s first understand how the traditional sand filter — used for decades — actually works.

2.0 Understanding Sand Filtration: How It Works and the Hidden Costs Behind It

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

2.1 The Basic Principle: Depth Filtration

The operation of a sand filter is relatively simple. It relies on the concept of depth filtration, where water slowly seeps through multiple layers of sand and gravel. These layers act as the filtration media, trapping suspended solids and impurities along the way.

Typically, a sand filter can capture particles down to 20–50 microns (Nominal Rating), while more complex multi-media filters can achieve finer filtration — around 10–15 microns.

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

2.2 The Critical Cleaning Step: Backwashing

As impurities accumulate within the sand bed, the system must periodically clean itself through a process known as backwashing — which represents one of the system’s biggest weaknesses.

During backwashing, the entire filtration process must stop completely. Clean water is pumped at high velocity in reverse, flushing the trapped solids out through the drain line. This process consumes an enormous amount of both water and energy — a “brute-force” cleaning method that is far from efficient.

2.3 The Core Limitations of Traditional Sand Filters

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

From this working principle, three major drawbacks become evident, each with a direct impact on industrial operations:

Production Downtime:
Every backwash cycle halts the entire filtration process for 15–30 minutes. To avoid interrupting production, factories must install multiple sand filter tanks in parallel — dramatically increasing capital costs and requiring large installation areas, up to six times larger than screen filters of equivalent capacity.

High Water and Energy Consumption:
Backwashing uses 5–10% of the total daily filtered water just for cleaning. Moreover, it requires high-pressure pumps that draw significant electrical power, wasting both water and energy.

Inconsistent Filtration Quality:
Over time, the sand media deteriorates as biofilm, oil residues, and other contaminants build up. This leads to issues like mudballs (clumping of debris) and channeling (uneven flow paths that let unfiltered water pass through). Ultimately, the sand media must be replaced every 3–5 years — a costly, labor-intensive process.

These inherent inefficiencies — especially the excessive use of water and energy — have driven the evolution toward smarter, more sustainable filtration technologies.

3.0 Alfawater’s Technological Leap: The Automatic Self-Cleaning Screen Filter

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

3.1 A Different Principle: Surface Filtration

Unlike sand filters, Alfawater’s Automatic Self-Cleaning Screen Filter operates using surface filtration. Instead of allowing impurities to penetrate deep into the media, contaminants are trapped directly on the inner surface of a precision-engineered stainless steel screen.

This allows absolute-rated filtration as fine as 10 microns, delivering consistent and reliable filtration results.

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

3.2 Smart Self-Cleaning Mechanism: Suction Scanning Technology

The most innovative feature of the Alfawater filter is its automatic self-cleaning mechanism, which activates without stopping the filtration process.

Triggered by a differential pressure sensor, the system detects when particles have accumulated on the screen and automatically initiates the cleaning cycle.

This process functions like a miniature vacuum robot, moving across the inner screen surface and suctioning away the collected debris. The cleaning sequence is completed within a few seconds, all while filtration continues uninterrupted.

3.3 Key Advantages of the Alfawater System

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

With its cutting-edge design, Alfawater’s automatic screen filter offers three major performance advantages:

  • 100% Continuous Flow Operation:
    Since cleaning occurs without downtime, production remains fully operational at all times — zero production interruption.
  • Minimal Water and Energy Use:
    The suction-scanning system consumes only a tiny fraction of water — for example, a unit processing 330 m³/h uses just 30 liters of water per cleaning cycle, taking only 6–25 seconds. This is less than 0.01% of the filtered volume, powered by a compact low-energy motor.
  • Low Maintenance & Long Service Life:
    The screen element is permanent and highly durable, eliminating the need for regular media replacement. This significantly reduces maintenance costs and labor over the system’s lifetime.

Now that we understand how both technologies work, let’s compare them side-by-side.

4.0 Side-by-Side Comparison: Sand Filter vs. Alfawater Screen Filter

ParameterTraditional Sand FilterAlfawater Automatic Screen Filter
Operation ContinuityStops for backwashing100% continuous flow
Cleaning Duration15–30+ minutes5–60 seconds
Water Consumption (Cleaning)Very high (5–10% of total filtered water)Extremely low (≈30 L per cycle)
Energy ConsumptionHigh (requires large pumps)Very low (small motor)
MaintenanceReplace sand every 3–5 yearsNo replacement needed
Installation FootprintLarge area requiredUp to 6× smaller

While these technical differences are clear, the real question is: how do they impact a factory’s bottom line?

5.0 Business Impact: Why This Difference Matters Financially

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

The excessive backwashing water used by sand filters creates what can be called a “Double Penalty” for industrial users:

  1. First Payment: For the clean water used in backwashing — which is immediately wasted.
  2. Second Payment: For wastewater treatment, since most utilities calculate treatment costs based on total water usage — including the water wasted during backwashing.

In contrast, Alfawater’s automatic self-cleaning filters consume negligible amounts of water, helping companies save massively on both fresh water and wastewater costs.

As a result, switching to Alfawater is not merely an equipment upgrade — it’s a strategic investment that leads to:

  • Lower operational costs
  • Higher productivity (no downtime)
  • Sustainable and resource-efficient operation

The difference in annual operating expenses (OPEX) is striking:
A traditional sand filter can cost THB 1,549,061 per year, while Alfawater’s system operates at only THB 17,921 per year.

That’s over 1.5 million baht saved annually — a clear sign of how outdated sand filters are draining company profits year after year.

Alfawater vs. Sand Filter

6.0 Conclusion: Time to Evolve Toward Smarter Water Filtration

The evolution of water filtration reflects a shift from force-based, wasteful methods (like sand filter backwashing) toward precision-driven, efficient, and automated systems.

For industrial operators seeking long-term competitiveness, adopting Alfawater’s automatic self-cleaning screen filter isn’t just about technology — it’s about future-proofing the business with sustainable, cost-efficient water management.

Is your factory ready to cut costs and boost productivity?

👉 Contact us today for a free water filtration assessment and discover how much your operation can save with Alfawater.

www.amco.co.th

https://amco.co.th/product-category/alfa-water

Alfawater

Line : @amco

Tel : 02 114 3085

Email : info@amco.co.th

Tags :

Categories :

Other Posts :

Shop Now